locking: Make rwsem_assert_held_write_nolockdep() build with PREEMPT_RT=y
BugLink: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2089700 The commit cited below broke the build for PREEMPT_RT because rwsem_assert_held_write_nolockdep() passes a struct rw_semaphore but rw_base_assert_held_write() expects struct rwbase_rt. Fixing the type alone leads to the problem that WARN_ON() is not found because bug.h is missing. In order to resolve this: - Keep the assert (WARN_ON()) in rwsem.h (not rwbase_rt.h) - Make rwsem_assert_held_write_nolockdep() do the implementation specific (rw_base) writer check. - Replace the "inline" with __always_inline which was used before. Fixes: f70405afc99b1 ("locking: Add rwsem_assert_held() and rwsem_assert_held_write()") Reported-by: Clark Williams <williams@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Reviewed-by: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240319182050.U4AzUF3I@linutronix.de (cherry picked from fa1f51162338b3e2f520d4bfedc42b3b2e00da6d) Signed-off-by: Kevin Becker <kevin.becker@canonical.com> Acked-by: Magali Lemes <magali.lemes@canonical.com> Acked-by: John Cabaj <john.cabaj@canonical.com>
This commit is contained in:
committed by
Kevin Becker
parent
c7e8509657
commit
e0eea8d35e
@@ -31,9 +31,9 @@ static __always_inline bool rw_base_is_locked(const struct rwbase_rt *rwb)
|
||||
return atomic_read(&rwb->readers) != READER_BIAS;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static inline void rw_base_assert_held_write(const struct rwbase_rt *rwb)
|
||||
static __always_inline bool rw_base_is_write_locked(const struct rwbase_rt *rwb)
|
||||
{
|
||||
WARN_ON(atomic_read(&rwb->readers) != WRITER_BIAS);
|
||||
return atomic_read(&rwb->readers) == WRITER_BIAS;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static __always_inline bool rw_base_is_contended(const struct rwbase_rt *rwb)
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -167,14 +167,14 @@ static __always_inline int rwsem_is_locked(const struct rw_semaphore *sem)
|
||||
return rw_base_is_locked(&sem->rwbase);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static inline void rwsem_assert_held_nolockdep(const struct rw_semaphore *sem)
|
||||
static __always_inline void rwsem_assert_held_nolockdep(const struct rw_semaphore *sem)
|
||||
{
|
||||
WARN_ON(!rwsem_is_locked(sem));
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static inline void rwsem_assert_held_write_nolockdep(const struct rw_semaphore *sem)
|
||||
static __always_inline void rwsem_assert_held_write_nolockdep(const struct rw_semaphore *sem)
|
||||
{
|
||||
rw_base_assert_held_write(sem);
|
||||
WARN_ON(!rw_base_is_write_locked(&sem->rwbase));
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static __always_inline int rwsem_is_contended(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user