tmakin/tegra-linux-noble
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

bpf: Tighten tail call checks for lingering locks, RCU, preempt_disable

Browse Source 
BugLink: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2101915

[ Upstream commit 46f7ed32f7a873d6675ea72e1d6317df41a55f81 ]

There are three situations when a program logically exits and transfers
control to the kernel or another program: bpf_throw, BPF_EXIT, and tail
calls. The former two check for any lingering locks and references, but
tail calls currently do not. Expand the checks to check for spin locks,
RCU read sections and preempt disabled sections.

Spin locks are indirectly preventing tail calls as function calls are
disallowed, but the checks for preemption and RCU are more relaxed,
hence ensure tail calls are prevented in their presence.

Fixes: 9bb00b2895 ("bpf: Add kfunc bpf_rcu_read_lock/unlock()")
Fixes: fc7566ad0a82 ("bpf: Introduce bpf_preempt_[disable,enable] kfuncs")
Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241103225940.1408302-2-memxor@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[koichiroden: dropped the check for preempt-disabled section due to
the missing commit:
fc7566ad0a82 ("bpf: Introduce bpf_preempt_[disable,enable] kfuncs")]
Signed-off-by: Koichiro Den <koichiro.den@canonical.com>
Signed-off-by: Stefan Bader <stefan.bader@canonical.com>
This commit is contained in:
Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2025-03-11 08:51:19 +09:00
committed by Stefan Bader
parent 7d5427dcb6
commit e0556a9285
1 changed files with 10 additions and 0 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files
kernel/bpf/verifier.c
+10
View File
@@ -10275,11 +10275,21 @@ static int check_helper_call(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_insn *insn
switch (func_id) {
case BPF_FUNC_tail_call:
if (env->cur_state->active_lock.ptr) {
verbose(env, "tail_call cannot be used inside bpf_spin_lock-ed region\n");
return -EINVAL;
}
err = check_reference_leak(env, false);
if (err) {
verbose(env, "tail_call would lead to reference leak\n");
return err;
}
if (env->cur_state->active_rcu_lock) {
verbose(env, "tail_call cannot be used inside bpf_rcu_read_lock-ed region\n");
return -EINVAL;
}
break;
case BPF_FUNC_get_local_storage:
/* check that flags argument in get_local_storage(map, flags) is 0,