selftests/seccomp: user_notification_addfd check nextfd is available
BugLink: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2070337 commit 8e3c9f9f3a0742cd12b682a1766674253b33fcf0 upstream. Currently the user_notification_addfd test checks what the next expected file descriptor will be by incrementing a variable nextfd. This does not account for file descriptors that may already be open before the test is started and will cause the test to fail if any exist. Replace nextfd++ with a function get_next_fd which will check and return the next available file descriptor. Signed-off-by: Terry Tritton <terry.tritton@linaro.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240124141357.1243457-4-terry.tritton@linaro.org Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Signed-off-by: Manuel Diewald <manuel.diewald@canonical.com> Signed-off-by: Stefan Bader <stefan.bader@canonical.com>
This commit is contained in:
committed by
Stefan Bader
parent
2750572ae2
commit
af45462a3b
@@ -4037,6 +4037,16 @@ TEST(user_notification_filter_empty_threaded)
|
||||
EXPECT_GT((pollfd.revents & POLLHUP) ?: 0, 0);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
int get_next_fd(int prev_fd)
|
||||
{
|
||||
for (int i = prev_fd + 1; i < FD_SETSIZE; ++i) {
|
||||
if (fcntl(i, F_GETFD) == -1)
|
||||
return i;
|
||||
}
|
||||
_exit(EXIT_FAILURE);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
TEST(user_notification_addfd)
|
||||
{
|
||||
pid_t pid;
|
||||
@@ -4053,7 +4063,7 @@ TEST(user_notification_addfd)
|
||||
/* There may be arbitrary already-open fds at test start. */
|
||||
memfd = memfd_create("test", 0);
|
||||
ASSERT_GE(memfd, 0);
|
||||
nextfd = memfd + 1;
|
||||
nextfd = get_next_fd(memfd);
|
||||
|
||||
ret = prctl(PR_SET_NO_NEW_PRIVS, 1, 0, 0, 0);
|
||||
ASSERT_EQ(0, ret) {
|
||||
@@ -4064,7 +4074,8 @@ TEST(user_notification_addfd)
|
||||
/* Check that the basic notification machinery works */
|
||||
listener = user_notif_syscall(__NR_getppid,
|
||||
SECCOMP_FILTER_FLAG_NEW_LISTENER);
|
||||
ASSERT_EQ(listener, nextfd++);
|
||||
ASSERT_EQ(listener, nextfd);
|
||||
nextfd = get_next_fd(nextfd);
|
||||
|
||||
pid = fork();
|
||||
ASSERT_GE(pid, 0);
|
||||
@@ -4119,14 +4130,16 @@ TEST(user_notification_addfd)
|
||||
|
||||
/* Verify we can set an arbitrary remote fd */
|
||||
fd = ioctl(listener, SECCOMP_IOCTL_NOTIF_ADDFD, &addfd);
|
||||
EXPECT_EQ(fd, nextfd++);
|
||||
EXPECT_EQ(fd, nextfd);
|
||||
nextfd = get_next_fd(nextfd);
|
||||
EXPECT_EQ(filecmp(getpid(), pid, memfd, fd), 0);
|
||||
|
||||
/* Verify we can set an arbitrary remote fd with large size */
|
||||
memset(&big, 0x0, sizeof(big));
|
||||
big.addfd = addfd;
|
||||
fd = ioctl(listener, SECCOMP_IOCTL_NOTIF_ADDFD_BIG, &big);
|
||||
EXPECT_EQ(fd, nextfd++);
|
||||
EXPECT_EQ(fd, nextfd);
|
||||
nextfd = get_next_fd(nextfd);
|
||||
|
||||
/* Verify we can set a specific remote fd */
|
||||
addfd.newfd = 42;
|
||||
@@ -4164,7 +4177,8 @@ TEST(user_notification_addfd)
|
||||
* Child has earlier "low" fds and now 42, so we expect the next
|
||||
* lowest available fd to be assigned here.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
EXPECT_EQ(fd, nextfd++);
|
||||
EXPECT_EQ(fd, nextfd);
|
||||
nextfd = get_next_fd(nextfd);
|
||||
ASSERT_EQ(filecmp(getpid(), pid, memfd, fd), 0);
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user