x86/bugs: Do not use UNTRAIN_RET with IBPB on entry
BugLink: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2097393 commit c62fa117c32bd1abed9304c58e0da6940f8c7fc2 upstream. Since X86_FEATURE_ENTRY_IBPB will invalidate all harmful predictions with IBPB, no software-based untraining of returns is needed anymore. Currently, this change affects retbleed and SRSO mitigations so if either of the mitigations is doing IBPB and the other one does the software sequence, the latter is not needed anymore. [ bp: Massage commit message. ] Suggested-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> Signed-off-by: Johannes Wikner <kwikner@ethz.ch> Cc: <stable@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Signed-off-by: Manuel Diewald <manuel.diewald@canonical.com> Signed-off-by: Koichiro Den <koichiro.den@canonical.com>
This commit is contained in:
committed by
Mehmet Basaran
parent
ce5fcb2b48
commit
abd45c6474
@@ -1112,6 +1112,15 @@ do_cmd_auto:
|
||||
|
||||
case RETBLEED_MITIGATION_IBPB:
|
||||
setup_force_cpu_cap(X86_FEATURE_ENTRY_IBPB);
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* IBPB on entry already obviates the need for
|
||||
* software-based untraining so clear those in case some
|
||||
* other mitigation like SRSO has selected them.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
setup_clear_cpu_cap(X86_FEATURE_UNRET);
|
||||
setup_clear_cpu_cap(X86_FEATURE_RETHUNK);
|
||||
|
||||
setup_force_cpu_cap(X86_FEATURE_IBPB_ON_VMEXIT);
|
||||
mitigate_smt = true;
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -2622,6 +2631,14 @@ static void __init srso_select_mitigation(void)
|
||||
if (has_microcode) {
|
||||
setup_force_cpu_cap(X86_FEATURE_ENTRY_IBPB);
|
||||
srso_mitigation = SRSO_MITIGATION_IBPB;
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* IBPB on entry already obviates the need for
|
||||
* software-based untraining so clear those in case some
|
||||
* other mitigation like Retbleed has selected them.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
setup_clear_cpu_cap(X86_FEATURE_UNRET);
|
||||
setup_clear_cpu_cap(X86_FEATURE_RETHUNK);
|
||||
}
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
pr_err("WARNING: kernel not compiled with CPU_IBPB_ENTRY.\n");
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user