arm64: module: remove old !KASAN_VMALLOC logic
Historically, KASAN could be selected with or without KASAN_VMALLOC, and we had to be very careful where to place modules when KASAN_VMALLOC was not selected. However, since commit:f6f37d9320("arm64: select KASAN_VMALLOC for SW/HW_TAGS modes") Selecting CONFIG_KASAN on arm64 will also select CONFIG_KASAN_VMALLOC, and so the logic for handling CONFIG_KASAN without CONFIG_KASAN_VMALLOC is redundant and can be removed. Note: the "kasan.vmalloc={on,off}" option which only exists for HW_TAGS changes whether the vmalloc region is given non-match-all tags, and does not affect the page table manipulation code. The VM_DEFER_KMEMLEAK flag was only necessary for !CONFIG_KASAN_VMALLOC as described in its introduction in commit:60115fa54a("mm: defer kmemleak object creation of module_alloc()") ... and therefore it can also be removed. Remove the redundant logic for !CONFIG_KASAN_VMALLOC. At the same time, add the missing braces around the multi-line conditional block in arch/arm64/kernel/module.c. Suggested-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Reviewed-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org> Cc: Alexander Potapenko <glider@google.com> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@google.com> Cc: Andrey Ryabinin <ryabinin.a.a@gmail.com> Cc: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com> Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org> Tested-by: Shanker Donthineni <sdonthineni@nvidia.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230530110328.2213762-2-mark.rutland@arm.com Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
This commit is contained in:
committed by
Catalin Marinas
parent
44c026a73b
commit
8339f7d8e1
@@ -48,16 +48,6 @@ static int __init kaslr_init(void)
|
||||
|
||||
pr_info("KASLR enabled\n");
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* KASAN without KASAN_VMALLOC does not expect the module region to
|
||||
* intersect the vmalloc region, since shadow memory is allocated for
|
||||
* each module at load time, whereas the vmalloc region will already be
|
||||
* shadowed by KASAN zero pages.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
BUILD_BUG_ON((IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_KASAN_GENERIC) ||
|
||||
IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_KASAN_SW_TAGS)) &&
|
||||
!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_KASAN_VMALLOC));
|
||||
|
||||
seed = get_random_u32();
|
||||
|
||||
if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_RANDOMIZE_MODULE_REGION_FULL)) {
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -32,33 +32,16 @@ void *module_alloc(unsigned long size)
|
||||
if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARM64_MODULE_PLTS))
|
||||
gfp_mask |= __GFP_NOWARN;
|
||||
|
||||
if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_KASAN_GENERIC) ||
|
||||
IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_KASAN_SW_TAGS))
|
||||
/* don't exceed the static module region - see below */
|
||||
module_alloc_end = MODULES_END;
|
||||
|
||||
p = __vmalloc_node_range(size, MODULE_ALIGN, module_alloc_base,
|
||||
module_alloc_end, gfp_mask, PAGE_KERNEL, VM_DEFER_KMEMLEAK,
|
||||
module_alloc_end, gfp_mask, PAGE_KERNEL, 0,
|
||||
NUMA_NO_NODE, __builtin_return_address(0));
|
||||
|
||||
if (!p && IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARM64_MODULE_PLTS) &&
|
||||
(IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_KASAN_VMALLOC) ||
|
||||
(!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_KASAN_GENERIC) &&
|
||||
!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_KASAN_SW_TAGS))))
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* KASAN without KASAN_VMALLOC can only deal with module
|
||||
* allocations being served from the reserved module region,
|
||||
* since the remainder of the vmalloc region is already
|
||||
* backed by zero shadow pages, and punching holes into it
|
||||
* is non-trivial. Since the module region is not randomized
|
||||
* when KASAN is enabled without KASAN_VMALLOC, it is even
|
||||
* less likely that the module region gets exhausted, so we
|
||||
* can simply omit this fallback in that case.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (!p && IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARM64_MODULE_PLTS)) {
|
||||
p = __vmalloc_node_range(size, MODULE_ALIGN, module_alloc_base,
|
||||
module_alloc_base + SZ_2G, GFP_KERNEL,
|
||||
PAGE_KERNEL, 0, NUMA_NO_NODE,
|
||||
__builtin_return_address(0));
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if (p && (kasan_alloc_module_shadow(p, size, gfp_mask) < 0)) {
|
||||
vfree(p);
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user