pinctrl: pinctrl-tps6594: make tps65224_muxval_remap and tps6594_muxval_remap as static to fix sparse warning
pinctrl: tps6594: Fix sparse warning. warning: symbol 'tps65224_muxval_remap' was not declared. Should it be static? warning: symbol 'tps6594_muxval_remap' was not declared. Should it be static? Signed-off-by: Nirmala Devi Mal Nadar <m.nirmaladevi@ltts.com> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202405111523.9yt759uX-lkp@intel.com/ Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/0109018f85002ae1-6fb831b2-74c2-4559-98f1-a3ef25e72558-000000@ap-south-1.amazonses.com Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
This commit is contained in:
committed by
Linus Walleij
parent
db43edf669
commit
72636eb9c1
@@ -237,13 +237,13 @@ struct muxval_remap {
|
||||
u8 remap;
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
struct muxval_remap tps65224_muxval_remap[] = {
|
||||
static struct muxval_remap tps65224_muxval_remap[] = {
|
||||
{5, TPS6594_PINCTRL_DISABLE_WDOG_FUNCTION, TPS65224_PINCTRL_WKUP_FUNCTION_GPIO5},
|
||||
{5, TPS65224_PINCTRL_SYNCCLKIN_FUNCTION, TPS65224_PINCTRL_SYNCCLKIN_FUNCTION_GPIO5},
|
||||
{5, TPS65224_PINCTRL_NSLEEP2_FUNCTION, TPS65224_PINCTRL_NSLEEP2_FUNCTION_GPIO5},
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
struct muxval_remap tps6594_muxval_remap[] = {
|
||||
static struct muxval_remap tps6594_muxval_remap[] = {
|
||||
{8, TPS6594_PINCTRL_DISABLE_WDOG_FUNCTION, TPS6594_PINCTRL_DISABLE_WDOG_FUNCTION_GPIO8},
|
||||
{8, TPS6594_PINCTRL_SYNCCLKOUT_FUNCTION, TPS6594_PINCTRL_SYNCCLKOUT_FUNCTION_GPIO8},
|
||||
{9, TPS6594_PINCTRL_CLK32KOUT_FUNCTION, TPS6594_PINCTRL_CLK32KOUT_FUNCTION_GPIO9},
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user