ipv4: fib: Flush all fib_info in fib_table_flush() during netns dismantle.
Even when fib_table_flush() is called with flush_all true, it does not flush all fib_info due to this condition: !(fi->fib_flags & RTNH_F_DEAD) && !fib_props[fa->fa_type].error) This creates an implicit ordering between default_device_exit_batch() and fib_net_exit_batch(). fib_table_flush(flush_all=true) must be called after all devices are NETDEV_UNREGISTERed, which is after nexthop_flush_dev() marks RTNH_F_DEAD. This would cause memory leak if the order were reversed. fib_table_flush() does not skip non-dead error routes when flush_all is true: !flush_all && !(fi->fib_flags & RTNH_F_DEAD) && fib_props[fa->fa_type].error Let's merge the two conditions not to skip all non-dead fib_info during netns dismantle. Note that we could further apply !flush_all to the basic table id check and the rtmsg_fib() call in the loop. Signed-off-by: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@google.com> Reviewed-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@nvidia.com> Reviewed-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260612063225.455191-2-kuniyu@google.com Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
This commit is contained in:
1 parent
e3d202a1ed
commit
64587e936b
1 file changed
+2
-8
+2
-8
@@ -2046,18 +2046,12 @@ int fib_table_flush(struct net *net, struct fib_table *tb, bool flush_all)
|
||||
hlist_for_each_entry_safe(fa, tmp, &n->leaf, fa_list) {
|
||||
struct fib_info *fi = fa->fa_info;
|
||||
|
||||
if (!fi || tb->tb_id != fa->tb_id ||
|
||||
(!(fi->fib_flags & RTNH_F_DEAD) &&
|
||||
!fib_props[fa->fa_type].error)) {
|
||||
if (!fi || tb->tb_id != fa->tb_id) {
|
||||
slen = fa->fa_slen;
|
||||
continue;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/* When not flushing the entire table, skip error
|
||||
* routes that are not marked for deletion.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (!flush_all && fib_props[fa->fa_type].error &&
|
||||
!(fi->fib_flags & RTNH_F_DEAD)) {
|
||||
if (!flush_all && !(fi->fib_flags & RTNH_F_DEAD)) {
|
||||
slen = fa->fa_slen;
|
||||
continue;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in new issue
Block a user