OMAP: DSS2: OMAPFB: make DBG() more resistant in if-else constructions
When DBG() is used in a simple if-else, the resulting code path
currently depends on the definition of DBG(). Inserting the statement in
a "do { ... } while (0)" prevents this possible misuse.
Signed-off-by: Niels de Vos <ndevos@redhat.com>
[tomi.valkeinen@ti.com: changed the title of the commit msg]
Signed-off-by: Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@ti.com>
This commit is contained in:
committed by
Tomi Valkeinen
parent
0d548a277c
commit
41b21aebe6
@@ -34,8 +34,10 @@
|
||||
#ifdef DEBUG
|
||||
extern unsigned int omapfb_debug;
|
||||
#define DBG(format, ...) \
|
||||
if (omapfb_debug) \
|
||||
printk(KERN_DEBUG "OMAPFB: " format, ## __VA_ARGS__)
|
||||
do { \
|
||||
if (omapfb_debug) \
|
||||
printk(KERN_DEBUG "OMAPFB: " format, ## __VA_ARGS__); \
|
||||
} while (0)
|
||||
#else
|
||||
#define DBG(format, ...)
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user