pinctrl: baytrail: Mark expected switch fall-throughs
In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases
where we are expecting to fall through.
Addresses-Coverity-ID: 1292308 ("Missing break in switch")
Addresses-Coverity-ID: 1292309 ("Missing break in switch")
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
Acked-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
This commit is contained in:
committed by
Linus Walleij
parent
ff10e353a4
commit
399476bd40
@@ -1534,11 +1534,13 @@ static void byt_irq_unmask(struct irq_data *d)
|
||||
switch (irqd_get_trigger_type(d)) {
|
||||
case IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH:
|
||||
value |= BYT_TRIG_LVL;
|
||||
/* fall through */
|
||||
case IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING:
|
||||
value |= BYT_TRIG_POS;
|
||||
break;
|
||||
case IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW:
|
||||
value |= BYT_TRIG_LVL;
|
||||
/* fall through */
|
||||
case IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_FALLING:
|
||||
value |= BYT_TRIG_NEG;
|
||||
break;
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user