e80d97a9c0
BugLink: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2102181 [ Upstream commit 3e643e4efa1e87432204b62f9cfdea3b2508c830 ] The bt_copy_from_sockptr() return value is being misinterpreted by most users: a non-zero result is mistakenly assumed to represent an error code, but actually indicates the number of bytes that could not be copied. Remove bt_copy_from_sockptr() and adapt callers to use copy_safe_from_sockptr(). For sco_sock_setsockopt() (case BT_CODEC) use copy_struct_from_sockptr() to scrub parts of uninitialized buffer. Opportunistically, rename `len` to `optlen` in hci_sock_setsockopt_old() and hci_sock_setsockopt(). Fixes: 51eda36d33e4 ("Bluetooth: SCO: Fix not validating setsockopt user input") Fixes: a97de7bff13b ("Bluetooth: RFCOMM: Fix not validating setsockopt user input") Fixes: 4f3951242ace ("Bluetooth: L2CAP: Fix not validating setsockopt user input") Fixes: 9e8742cdfc4b ("Bluetooth: ISO: Fix not validating setsockopt user input") Fixes: b2186061d604 ("Bluetooth: hci_sock: Fix not validating setsockopt user input") Reviewed-by: Luiz Augusto von Dentz <luiz.von.dentz@intel.com> Reviewed-by: David Wei <dw@davidwei.uk> Signed-off-by: Michal Luczaj <mhal@rbox.co> Signed-off-by: Luiz Augusto von Dentz <luiz.von.dentz@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Koichiro Den <koichiro.den@canonical.com> Signed-off-by: Mehmet Basaran <mehmet.basaran@canonical.com>