BugLink: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2080908
Move the PRESERVE_BOOT_CONFIG _DSM evaluation from acpi_pci_root_create()
to pci_register_host_bridge().
This will help unify the ACPI _DSM path and the DT-based
"linux,pci-probe-only" paths.
This should be safe because it happens earlier than it used to:
acpi_pci_root_create
pci_create_root_bus
pci_register_host_bridge
+ bridge->preserve_config = pci_preserve_config(bridge)
pci_acpi_preserve_config
+ acpi_evaluate_dsm_typed(DSM_PCI_PRESERVE_BOOT_CONFIG)
- acpi_evaluate_dsm_typed(DSM_PCI_PRESERVE_BOOT_CONFIG)
No functional change intended.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240508174138.3630283-2-vidyas@nvidia.com
Signed-off-by: Vidya Sagar <vidyas@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
(cherry picked from commit 9d7d5db8e78ef1b67690bbffa5af60016d8e279d)
Signed-off-by: Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@nvidia.com>
Acked-by: Noah Wager <noah.wager@canonical.com>
Acked-by: Jacob Martin <jacob.martin@canonical.com>
Signed-off-by: Noah Wager <noah.wager@canonical.com>
BugLink: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2060704
On Fri, Sep 22 2023 at 00:55, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 21 2023 at 09:00, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>> That said - I think as a proof of concept and "look, with this we get
>> the expected scheduling event counts", that patch is perfect. I think
>> you more than proved the concept.
>
> There is certainly quite some analyis work to do to make this a one to
> one replacement.
>
> With a handful of benchmarks the PoC (tweaked with some obvious fixes)
> is pretty much on par with the current mainline variants (NONE/FULL),
> but the memtier benchmark makes a massive dent.
>
> It sports a whopping 10% regression with the LAZY mode versus the mainline
> NONE model. Non-LAZY and FULL behave unsurprisingly in the same way.
>
> That benchmark is really sensitive to the preemption model. With current
> mainline (DYNAMIC_PREEMPT enabled) the preempt=FULL model has ~20%
> performance drop versus preempt=NONE.
That 20% was a tired pilot error. The real number is in the 5% ballpark.
> I have no clue what's going on there yet, but that shows that there is
> obviously quite some work ahead to get this sorted.
It took some head scratching to figure that out. The initial fix broke
the handling of the hog issue, i.e. the problem that Ankur tried to
solve, but I hacked up a "solution" for that too.
With that the memtier benchmark is roughly back to the mainline numbers,
but my throughput benchmark know how is pretty close to zero, so that
should be looked at by people who actually understand these things.
Likewise the hog prevention is just at the PoC level and clearly beyond
my knowledge of scheduler details: It unconditionally forces a
reschedule when the looping task is not responding to a lazy reschedule
request before the next tick. IOW it forces a reschedule on the second
tick, which is obviously different from the cond_resched()/might_sleep()
behaviour.
The changes vs. the original PoC aside of the bug and thinko fixes:
1) A hack to utilize the TRACE_FLAG_IRQS_NOSUPPORT flag to trace the
lazy preempt bit as the trace_entry::flags field is full already.
That obviously breaks the tracer ABI, but if we go there then
this needs to be fixed. Steven?
2) debugfs file to validate that loops can be force preempted w/o
cond_resched()
The usage is:
# taskset -c 1 bash
# echo 1 > /sys/kernel/debug/sched/hog &
# echo 1 > /sys/kernel/debug/sched/hog &
# echo 1 > /sys/kernel/debug/sched/hog &
top shows ~33% CPU for each of the hogs and tracing confirms that
the crude hack in the scheduler tick works:
bash-4559 [001] dlh2. 2253.331202: resched_curr <-__update_curr
bash-4560 [001] dlh2. 2253.340199: resched_curr <-__update_curr
bash-4561 [001] dlh2. 2253.346199: resched_curr <-__update_curr
bash-4559 [001] dlh2. 2253.353199: resched_curr <-__update_curr
bash-4561 [001] dlh2. 2253.358199: resched_curr <-__update_curr
bash-4560 [001] dlh2. 2253.370202: resched_curr <-__update_curr
bash-4559 [001] dlh2. 2253.378198: resched_curr <-__update_curr
bash-4561 [001] dlh2. 2253.389199: resched_curr <-__update_curr
The 'l' instead of the usual 'N' reflects that the lazy resched
bit is set. That makes __update_curr() invoke resched_curr()
instead of the lazy variant. resched_curr() sets TIF_NEED_RESCHED
and folds it into preempt_count so that preemption happens at the
next possible point, i.e. either in return from interrupt or at
the next preempt_enable().
That's as much as I wanted to demonstrate and I'm not going to spend
more cycles on it as I have already too many other things on flight and
the resulting scheduler woes are clearly outside of my expertice.
Though definitely I'm putting a permanent NAK in place for any attempts
to duct tape the preempt=NONE model any further by sprinkling more
cond*() and whatever warts around.
Thanks,
tglx
[tglx: s@CONFIG_PREEMPT_AUTO@CONFIG_PREEMPT_BUILD_AUTO@ ]
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/87jzshhexi.ffs@tglx/
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Becker <kevin.becker@canonical.com>
BugLink: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2114239
[ Upstream commit ab930483eca9f3e816c35824b5868599af0c61d7 ]
While analysing code for software and OF node for the corner case when
caller asks to read zero items in the supposed to be an array of values
I found that ACPI behaves differently to what OF does, i.e.
1. It returns -EINVAL when caller asks to read zero items from integer
array, while OF returns 0, if no other errors happened.
2. It returns -EINVAL when caller asks to read zero items from string
array, while OF returns -ENODATA, if no other errors happened.
Amend ACPI implementation to follow what OF does.
Fixes: b31384fa5d ("Driver core: Unified device properties interface for platform firmware")
Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20250203194629.3731895-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com
[ rjw: Added empty line after a conditional ]
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Noah Wager <noah.wager@canonical.com>
Signed-off-by: Mehmet Basaran <mehmet.basaran@canonical.com>
BugLink: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2114239
[ Upstream commit 5c0e00a391dd0099fe95991bb2f962848d851916 ]
The GHES driver overrides the panic= setting by force-rebooting the
system after a fatal hw error has been reported. The intent being that
such an error would be reported earlier.
However, this is not optimal when a hard-to-debug issue requires long
time to reproduce and when that happens, the box will get rebooted after
30 seconds and thus destroy the whole hw context of when the error
happened.
So rip out the default GHES panic timeout and honor the global one.
In the panic disabled (panic=0) case, the error will still be logged to
dmesg for later inspection and if panic after a hw error is really
required, then that can be controlled the usual way - use panic= on the
cmdline or set it in the kernel .config's CONFIG_PANIC_TIMEOUT.
Reported-by: Feng Tang <feng.tang@linux.alibaba.com>
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov (AMD) <bp@alien8.de>
Reviewed-by: Feng Tang <feng.tang@linux.alibaba.com>
Reviewed-by: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@intel.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20250113125224.GFZ4UMiNtWIJvgpveU@fat_crate.local
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Noah Wager <noah.wager@canonical.com>
Signed-off-by: Mehmet Basaran <mehmet.basaran@canonical.com>
BugLink: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2111953
[ Upstream commit 26c0a2d93af55d30a46d5f45d3e9c42cde730168 ]
The enable_gpe_wakeup() function calls acpi_enable_all_wakeup_gpes(),
and the later one may call the preempt_schedule_common() function,
resulting in a thread switch and causing the CPU to be in an interrupt
enabled state after the enable_gpe_wakeup() function returns, leading
to the warnings as follow.
[ C0] WARNING: ... at kernel/time/timekeeping.c:845 ktime_get+0xbc/0xc8
[ C0] ...
[ C0] Call Trace:
[ C0] [<90000000002243b4>] show_stack+0x64/0x188
[ C0] [<900000000164673c>] dump_stack_lvl+0x60/0x88
[ C0] [<90000000002687e4>] __warn+0x8c/0x148
[ C0] [<90000000015e9978>] report_bug+0x1c0/0x2b0
[ C0] [<90000000016478e4>] do_bp+0x204/0x3b8
[ C0] [<90000000025b1924>] exception_handlers+0x1924/0x10000
[ C0] [<9000000000343bbc>] ktime_get+0xbc/0xc8
[ C0] [<9000000000354c08>] tick_sched_timer+0x30/0xb0
[ C0] [<90000000003408e0>] __hrtimer_run_queues+0x160/0x378
[ C0] [<9000000000341f14>] hrtimer_interrupt+0x144/0x388
[ C0] [<9000000000228348>] constant_timer_interrupt+0x38/0x48
[ C0] [<90000000002feba4>] __handle_irq_event_percpu+0x64/0x1e8
[ C0] [<90000000002fed48>] handle_irq_event_percpu+0x20/0x80
[ C0] [<9000000000306b9c>] handle_percpu_irq+0x5c/0x98
[ C0] [<90000000002fd4a0>] generic_handle_domain_irq+0x30/0x48
[ C0] [<9000000000d0c7b0>] handle_cpu_irq+0x70/0xa8
[ C0] [<9000000001646b30>] handle_loongarch_irq+0x30/0x48
[ C0] [<9000000001646bc8>] do_vint+0x80/0xe0
[ C0] [<90000000002aea1c>] finish_task_switch.isra.0+0x8c/0x2a8
[ C0] [<900000000164e34c>] __schedule+0x314/0xa48
[ C0] [<900000000164ead8>] schedule+0x58/0xf0
[ C0] [<9000000000294a2c>] worker_thread+0x224/0x498
[ C0] [<900000000029d2f0>] kthread+0xf8/0x108
[ C0] [<9000000000221f28>] ret_from_kernel_thread+0xc/0xa4
[ C0]
[ C0] ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---
The root cause is acpi_enable_all_wakeup_gpes() uses a mutex to protect
acpi_hw_enable_all_wakeup_gpes(), and acpi_ut_acquire_mutex() may cause
a thread switch. Since there is no longer concurrent execution during
loongarch_acpi_suspend(), we can call acpi_hw_enable_all_wakeup_gpes()
directly in enable_gpe_wakeup().
The solution is similar to commit 22db06337f ("ACPI: sleep: Avoid
breaking S3 wakeup due to might_sleep()").
Fixes: 366bb35a8e ("LoongArch: Add suspend (ACPI S3) support")
Signed-off-by: Qunqin Zhao <zhaoqunqin@loongson.cn>
Signed-off-by: Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@loongson.cn>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
CVE-2025-21803
Signed-off-by: Manuel Diewald <manuel.diewald@canonical.com>
Signed-off-by: Mehmet Basaran <mehmet.basaran@canonical.com>
BugLink: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2106770
commit 7ed4e4a659d99499dc6968c61970d41b64feeac0 upstream.
The TongFang GM5HG0A is a TongFang barebone design which is sold under
various brand names.
The ACPI IRQ override for the keyboard IRQ must be used on these AMD Zen
laptops in order for the IRQ to work.
At least on the SKIKK Vanaheim variant the DMI product- and board-name
strings have been replaced by the OEM with "Vanaheim" so checking that
board-name contains "GM5HG0A" as is usually done for TongFang barebones
quirks does not work.
The DMI OEM strings do contain "GM5HG0A". I have looked at the dmidecode
for a few other TongFang devices and the TongFang code-name string being
in the OEM strings seems to be something which is consistently true.
Add a quirk checking one of the DMI_OEM_STRING(s) is "GM5HG0A" in the hope
that this will work for other OEM versions of the "GM5HG0A" too.
Link: https://www.skikk.eu/en/laptops/vanaheim-15-rtx-4060
Closes: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=219614
Cc: All applicable <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20241228164845.42381-1-hdegoede@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Manuel Diewald <manuel.diewald@canonical.com>
Signed-off-by: Mehmet Basaran <mehmet.basaran@canonical.com>
BugLink: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2102118
[ Upstream commit 82f250ed1a1dcde0ad2a1513f85af7f9514635e8 ]
The Acer Iconia One 8 A1-840 (not to be confused with the A1-840FHD which
is a different model) ships with Android 4.4 as factory OS and has the
usual broken DSDT issues for x86 Android tablets.
Add quirks to skip ACPI I2C client enumeration and disable ACPI battery/AC
and ACPI GPIO event handlers.
Also add the "INT33F5" HID for the TI PMIC used on this tablet to the list
of HIDs for which not to skip i2c_client instantiation, since we do want
an ACPI instantiated i2c_client for the PMIC.
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20241116095825.11660-1-hdegoede@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Koichiro Den <koichiro.den@canonical.com>
Signed-off-by: Stefan Bader <stefan.bader@canonical.com>
BugLink: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2102118
[ Upstream commit 7f261203d7c2e0c06e668b25dfaaee091a79ab25 ]
The Vexia EDU ATLA 10 tablet (9V version) which shipped with Android 4.2
as factory OS has the usual broken DSDT issues for x86 Android tablets.
On top of that this tablet is special because all its LPSS island
peripherals are enumerated as PCI devices rather then as ACPI devices as
they typically are.
For the x86-android-tablets kmod to be able to instantiate a serdev client
for the Bluetooth HCI on this tablet, an ACPI_QUIRK_UART1_SKIP quirk is
necessary.
Modify acpi_dmi_skip_serdev_enumeration() to work with PCI enumerated
UARTs without an UID, such as the UARTs on this tablet.
Also make acpi_dmi_skip_serdev_enumeration() exit early if there are no
quirks, since there is nothing to do then.
And add the necessary quirks for the Vexia EDU ATLA 10 tablet.
This should compile with CONFIG_PCI being unset without issues because
dev_is_pci() is defined as "(false)" then.
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20241109215936.83004-1-hdegoede@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Koichiro Den <koichiro.den@canonical.com>
Signed-off-by: Stefan Bader <stefan.bader@canonical.com>
BugLink: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2097575
commit 3d1c651272cf1df8aac7d9b6d92d836d27bed50f upstream.
Clang 19 prints a warning when we pass &th->guid to efi_pa_va_lookup():
drivers/acpi/prmt.c:156:29: error: passing 1-byte aligned argument to
4-byte aligned parameter 1 of 'efi_pa_va_lookup' may result in an
unaligned pointer access [-Werror,-Walign-mismatch]
156 | (void *)efi_pa_va_lookup(&th->guid, handler_info->handler_address);
| ^
The problem is that efi_pa_va_lookup() takes a efi_guid_t and &th->guid
is a regular guid_t. The difference between the two types is the
alignment. efi_guid_t is a typedef.
typedef guid_t efi_guid_t __aligned(__alignof__(u32));
It's possible that this a bug in Clang 19. Even though the alignment of
&th->guid is not explicitly specified, it will still end up being aligned
at 4 or 8 bytes.
Anyway, as Ard points out, it's cleaner to change guid to efi_guid_t type
and that also makes the warning go away.
Fixes: 088984c8d54c ("ACPI: PRM: Find EFI_MEMORY_RUNTIME block for PRM handler and context")
Reported-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@linaro.org>
Suggested-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@linaro.org>
Tested-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/3777d71b-9e19-45f4-be4e-17bf4fa7a834@stanley.mountain
[ rjw: Subject edit ]
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Manuel Diewald <manuel.diewald@canonical.com>
Signed-off-by: Stefan Bader <stefan.bader@canonical.com>
BugLink: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2097575
commit 088984c8d54c0053fc4ae606981291d741c5924b upstream.
PRMT needs to find the correct type of block to translate the PA-VA
mapping for EFI runtime services.
The issue arises because the PRMT is finding a block of type
EFI_CONVENTIONAL_MEMORY, which is not appropriate for runtime services
as described in Section 2.2.2 (Runtime Services) of the UEFI
Specification [1]. Since the PRM handler is a type of runtime service,
this causes an exception when the PRM handler is called.
[Firmware Bug]: Unable to handle paging request in EFI runtime service
WARNING: CPU: 22 PID: 4330 at drivers/firmware/efi/runtime-wrappers.c:341
__efi_queue_work+0x11c/0x170
Call trace:
Let PRMT find a block with EFI_MEMORY_RUNTIME for PRM handler and PRM
context.
If no suitable block is found, a warning message will be printed, but
the procedure continues to manage the next PRM handler.
However, if the PRM handler is actually called without proper allocation,
it would result in a failure during error handling.
By using the correct memory types for runtime services, ensure that the
PRM handler and the context are properly mapped in the virtual address
space during runtime, preventing the paging request error.
The issue is really that only memory that has been remapped for runtime
by the firmware can be used by the PRM handler, and so the region needs
to have the EFI_MEMORY_RUNTIME attribute.
Link: https://uefi.org/sites/default/files/resources/UEFI_Spec_2_10_Aug29.pdf # [1]
Fixes: cefc7ca462 ("ACPI: PRM: implement OperationRegion handler for the PlatformRtMechanism subtype")
Cc: All applicable <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Koba Ko <kobak@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Matthew R. Ochs <mochs@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20241012205010.4165798-1-kobak@nvidia.com
[ rjw: Subject and changelog edits ]
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Manuel Diewald <manuel.diewald@canonical.com>
Signed-off-by: Stefan Bader <stefan.bader@canonical.com>
BugLink: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2098104
Impact: Merge conflict avoidance
Fix: This patch is just here so that the next patch in the series "ACPI:
resource: Do IRQ override on TongFang GXxHRXx and GMxHGxx" applies without
a merge conflict.
Testcase: Field tested on several TUXEDO devices.
Use ACPI IRQ override on Maibenben X565 laptop to make the internal
keyboard work.
Add a new entry to the irq1_edge_low_force_override structure, similar
to the existing ones.
Signed-off-by: Sergey Kalinichev <kalinichev.so.0@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
(cherry picked from commit 00efe7fcf9ceeff0808bca9460afb49e7ada6068)
Signed-off-by: Werner Sembach <wse@tuxedocomputers.com>
Acked-by: Koichiro Den <koichiro.den@canonical.com>
Acked-by: Stewart Hore <stewart.hore@canonical.com>
Signed-off-by: Koichiro Den <koichiro.den@canonical.com>
The following BUG was triggered:
=============================
[ BUG: Invalid wait context ]
6.12.0-rc2-XXX #406 Not tainted
-----------------------------
kworker/1:1/62 is trying to lock:
ffffff8801593030 (&cpc_ptr->rmw_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: cpc_write+0xcc/0x370
other info that might help us debug this:
context-{5:5}
2 locks held by kworker/1:1/62:
#0: ffffff897ef5ec98 (&rq->__lock){-.-.}-{2:2}, at: raw_spin_rq_lock_nested+0x2c/0x50
#1: ffffff880154e238 (&sg_policy->update_lock){....}-{2:2}, at: sugov_update_shared+0x3c/0x280
stack backtrace:
CPU: 1 UID: 0 PID: 62 Comm: kworker/1:1 Not tainted 6.12.0-rc2-g9654bd3e8806 #406
Workqueue: 0x0 (events)
Call trace:
dump_backtrace+0xa4/0x130
show_stack+0x20/0x38
dump_stack_lvl+0x90/0xd0
dump_stack+0x18/0x28
__lock_acquire+0x480/0x1ad8
lock_acquire+0x114/0x310
_raw_spin_lock+0x50/0x70
cpc_write+0xcc/0x370
cppc_set_perf+0xa0/0x3a8
cppc_cpufreq_fast_switch+0x40/0xc0
cpufreq_driver_fast_switch+0x4c/0x218
sugov_update_shared+0x234/0x280
update_load_avg+0x6ec/0x7b8
dequeue_entities+0x108/0x830
dequeue_task_fair+0x58/0x408
__schedule+0x4f0/0x1070
schedule+0x54/0x130
worker_thread+0xc0/0x2e8
kthread+0x130/0x148
ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20
sugov_update_shared() locks a raw_spinlock while cpc_write() locks a
spinlock.
To have a correct wait-type order, update rmw_lock to a raw spinlock and
ensure that interrupts will be disabled on the CPU holding it.
Fixes: 60949b7b8054 ("ACPI: CPPC: Fix MASK_VAL() usage")
Signed-off-by: Pierre Gondois <pierre.gondois@arm.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20241028125657.1271512-1-pierre.gondois@arm.com
[ rjw: Changelog edits ]
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
CVE-2024-50249
(cherry picked from commit 1c10941e34c5fdc0357e46a25bd130d9cf40b925)
Signed-off-by: Massimiliano Pellizzer <massimiliano.pellizzer@canonical.com>
Acked-by: Koichiro Den <koichiro.den@canonical.com>
Acked-by: Stewart Hore <stewart.hore@canonical.com>
Signed-off-by: Koichiro Den <koichiro.den@canonical.com>
BugLink: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2097301
commit 435f2d87579e2408ab6502248f2270fc3c9e636e upstream.
Like the various 14" Asus ExpertBook B2 B2402* models there are also
4 variants of the 15" Asus ExpertBook B2 B2502* models:
B2502CBA: 12th gen Intel CPU, non flip
B2502FBA: 12th gen Intel CPU, flip
B2502CVA: 13th gen Intel CPU, non flip
B2502FVA: 13th gen Intel CPU, flip
Currently there already are DMI quirks for the B2502CBA, B2502FBA and
B2502CVA models. Asus website shows that there also is a B2502FVA.
Rather then adding a 4th quirk fold the 3 existing quirks into a single
quirk covering B2502* to also cover the last model while at the same time
reducing the number of quirks.
Cc: All applicable <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20241005212819.354681-3-hdegoede@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Manuel Diewald <manuel.diewald@canonical.com>
Signed-off-by: Koichiro Den <koichiro.den@canonical.com>
BugLink: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2089884
[ Upstream commit 76959aff14a0012ad6b984ec7686d163deccdc16 ]
When a battery hook returns an error when adding a new battery, then
the battery hook is automatically unregistered.
However the battery hook provider cannot know that, so it will later
call battery_hook_unregister() on the already unregistered battery
hook, resulting in a crash.
Fix this by using the list head to mark already unregistered battery
hooks as already being unregistered so that they can be ignored by
battery_hook_unregister().
Fixes: fa93854f7a ("battery: Add the battery hooking API")
Signed-off-by: Armin Wolf <W_Armin@gmx.de>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20241001212835.341788-3-W_Armin@gmx.de
Cc: All applicable <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Koichiro Den <koichiro.den@canonical.com>
Signed-off-by: Roxana Nicolescu <roxana.nicolescu@canonical.com>
BugLink: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2089884
[ Upstream commit dc171114926ec390ab90f46534545420ec03e458 ]
It is not particularly useful to release locks (the EC mutex and the
ACPI global lock, if present) and re-acquire them immediately thereafter
during EC address space accesses in acpi_ec_space_handler().
First, releasing them for a while before grabbing them again does not
really help anyone because there may not be enough time for another
thread to acquire them.
Second, if another thread successfully acquires them and carries out
a new EC write or read in the middle if an operation region access in
progress, it may confuse the EC firmware, especially after the burst
mode has been enabled.
Finally, manipulating the locks after writing or reading every single
byte of data is overhead that it is better to avoid.
Accordingly, modify the code to carry out EC address space accesses
entirely without releasing the locks.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/12473338.O9o76ZdvQC@rjwysocki.net
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Koichiro Den <koichiro.den@canonical.com>
Signed-off-by: Roxana Nicolescu <roxana.nicolescu@canonical.com>
BugLink: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2089340
[ Upstream commit c82c507126c9c9db350be28f14c83fad1c7969ae ]
ACPICA commit 129b75516fc49fe1fd6b8c5798f86c13854630b3
Stop nagging user about every Stall() that violates the spec
On my Dell XPS 15 7590 I get hundreds of these warnings after few hours of
uptime:
$ dmesg | grep "fix the firmware" | wc -l
261
I cannot fix the firmware and I doubt that Dell cares about 4 year old
laptop either
Fixes: ace8f1c54a ("ACPICA: executer/exsystem: Inform users about ACPI spec violation")
Link: https://github.com/acpica/acpica/commit/129b7551
Signed-off-by: Vasily Khoruzhick <anarsoul@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Portia Stephens <portia.stephens@canonical.com>
Signed-off-by: Stefan Bader <stefan.bader@canonical.com>
Vidya Sagar
Thomas Gleixner
Aubrey Li
Andy Shevchenko
Borislav Petkov
Huacai Chen
Joe Hattori
Hans de Goede
Qinxin Xia
Yicong Yang
Daniil Tatianin
Ilpo Järvinen
Suraj Sonawane
Jonathan Denose
Lifeng Zheng
Aleksandr Mishin
Dan Carpenter
Shubham Panwar
Koba Ko
Christian Heusel
liwei
Christoffer Sandberg
Sergey Kalinichev
Pierre Gondois
Tamim Khan
Armin Wolf
Aleksandrs Vinarskis
Pei Xiao
Rafael J. Wysocki
Mario Limonciello
Seiji Nishikawa
Li Chen
Vasily Khoruzhick