From ed67ccd112747929140aa988aa5c3ea287857f28 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jianbo Liu Date: Mon, 8 Jul 2024 09:58:12 +0300 Subject: [PATCH] xfrm: call xfrm_dev_policy_delete when kill policy BugLink: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2083196 [ Upstream commit 89a2aefe4b084686c2ffc1ee939585111ea4fc0f ] xfrm_policy_kill() is called at different places to delete xfrm policy. It will call xfrm_pol_put(). But xfrm_dev_policy_delete() is not called to free the policy offloaded to hardware. The three commits cited here are to handle this issue by calling xfrm_dev_policy_delete() outside xfrm_get_policy(). But they didn't cover all the cases. An example, which is not handled for now, is xfrm_policy_insert(). It is called when XFRM_MSG_UPDPOLICY request is received. Old policy is replaced by new one, but the offloaded policy is not deleted, so driver doesn't have the chance to release hardware resources. To resolve this issue for all cases, move xfrm_dev_policy_delete() into xfrm_policy_kill(), so the offloaded policy can be deleted from hardware when it is called, which avoids hardware resources leakage. Fixes: 919e43fad516 ("xfrm: add an interface to offload policy") Fixes: bf06fcf4be0f ("xfrm: add missed call to delete offloaded policies") Fixes: 982c3aca8bac ("xfrm: delete offloaded policy") Signed-off-by: Jianbo Liu Reviewed-by: Cosmin Ratiu Signed-off-by: Leon Romanovsky Signed-off-by: Steffen Klassert Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin Signed-off-by: Portia Stephens Signed-off-by: Roxana Nicolescu --- net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c | 5 ++--- net/xfrm/xfrm_user.c | 1 - 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c b/net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c index 947a6e695b29..c919fbc6c5aa 100644 --- a/net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c +++ b/net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c @@ -451,6 +451,8 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(xfrm_policy_destroy); static void xfrm_policy_kill(struct xfrm_policy *policy) { + xfrm_dev_policy_delete(policy); + write_lock_bh(&policy->lock); policy->walk.dead = 1; write_unlock_bh(&policy->lock); @@ -1849,7 +1851,6 @@ again: __xfrm_policy_unlink(pol, dir); spin_unlock_bh(&net->xfrm.xfrm_policy_lock); - xfrm_dev_policy_delete(pol); cnt++; xfrm_audit_policy_delete(pol, 1, task_valid); xfrm_policy_kill(pol); @@ -1890,7 +1891,6 @@ again: __xfrm_policy_unlink(pol, dir); spin_unlock_bh(&net->xfrm.xfrm_policy_lock); - xfrm_dev_policy_delete(pol); cnt++; xfrm_audit_policy_delete(pol, 1, task_valid); xfrm_policy_kill(pol); @@ -2341,7 +2341,6 @@ int xfrm_policy_delete(struct xfrm_policy *pol, int dir) pol = __xfrm_policy_unlink(pol, dir); spin_unlock_bh(&net->xfrm.xfrm_policy_lock); if (pol) { - xfrm_dev_policy_delete(pol); xfrm_policy_kill(pol); return 0; } diff --git a/net/xfrm/xfrm_user.c b/net/xfrm/xfrm_user.c index 912c1189ba41..0b8336be63ac 100644 --- a/net/xfrm/xfrm_user.c +++ b/net/xfrm/xfrm_user.c @@ -2348,7 +2348,6 @@ static int xfrm_get_policy(struct sk_buff *skb, struct nlmsghdr *nlh, NETLINK_CB(skb).portid); } } else { - xfrm_dev_policy_delete(xp); xfrm_audit_policy_delete(xp, err ? 0 : 1, true); if (err != 0)