PM / suspend: Prevent might sleep splats
timekeeping suspend/resume calls read_persistent_clock() which takes rtc_lock. That results in might sleep warnings because at that point we run with interrupts disabled. We cannot convert rtc_lock to a raw spinlock as that would trigger other might sleep warnings. As a workaround we disable the might sleep warnings by setting system_state to SYSTEM_SUSPEND before calling sysdev_suspend() and restoring it to SYSTEM_RUNNING afer sysdev_resume(). There is no lock contention because hibernate / suspend to RAM is single-CPU at this point. In s2idle's case the system_state is set to SYSTEM_SUSPEND before timekeeping_suspend() which is invoked by the last CPU. In the resume case it set back to SYSTEM_RUNNING after timekeeping_resume() which is invoked by the first CPU in the resume case. The other CPUs will block on tick_freeze_lock. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> [bigeasy: cover s2idle in tick_freeze() / tick_unfreeze()] Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
This commit is contained in:
committed by
Rafael J. Wysocki
parent
771c577c23
commit
c1a957d170
@@ -490,6 +490,7 @@ void tick_freeze(void)
|
||||
if (tick_freeze_depth == num_online_cpus()) {
|
||||
trace_suspend_resume(TPS("timekeeping_freeze"),
|
||||
smp_processor_id(), true);
|
||||
system_state = SYSTEM_SUSPEND;
|
||||
timekeeping_suspend();
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
tick_suspend_local();
|
||||
@@ -513,6 +514,7 @@ void tick_unfreeze(void)
|
||||
|
||||
if (tick_freeze_depth == num_online_cpus()) {
|
||||
timekeeping_resume();
|
||||
system_state = SYSTEM_RUNNING;
|
||||
trace_suspend_resume(TPS("timekeeping_freeze"),
|
||||
smp_processor_id(), false);
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user