tmakin/tegra-linux-noble
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

sched/numa: Remove the numa_balancing_scan_period_reset sysctl

Browse Source 
With scan rate adaptions based on whether the workload has properly
converged or not there should be no need for the scan period reset
hammer. Get rid of it.

Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1381141781-10992-60-git-send-email-mgorman@suse.de
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
This commit is contained in:
Mel Gorman
2013-10-07 11:29:37 +01:00
committed by Ingo Molnar
parent 04bb2f9475
commit 930aa174fc
6 changed files with 4 additions and 37 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files
kernel/sched/core.c
-1
View File
@@ -1721,7 +1721,6 @@ static void __sched_fork(unsigned long clone_flags, struct task_struct *p)
#ifdef CONFIG_NUMA_BALANCING
if (p->mm && atomic_read(&p->mm->mm_users) == 1) {
p->mm->numa_next_scan = jiffies + msecs_to_jiffies(sysctl_numa_balancing_scan_delay);
p->mm->numa_next_reset = jiffies + msecs_to_jiffies(sysctl_numa_balancing_scan_period_reset);
p->mm->numa_scan_seq = 0;
}
kernel/sched/fair.c
+1 -17
View File
@@ -826,7 +826,6 @@ update_stats_curr_start(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, struct sched_entity *se)
*/
unsigned int sysctl_numa_balancing_scan_period_min = 1000;
unsigned int sysctl_numa_balancing_scan_period_max = 60000;
unsigned int sysctl_numa_balancing_scan_period_reset = 60000;
/* Portion of address space to scan in MB */
unsigned int sysctl_numa_balancing_scan_size = 256;
@@ -1685,24 +1684,9 @@ void task_numa_work(struct callback_head *work)
if (p->flags & PF_EXITING)
return;
if (!mm->numa_next_reset || !mm->numa_next_scan) {
if (!mm->numa_next_scan) {
mm->numa_next_scan = now +
msecs_to_jiffies(sysctl_numa_balancing_scan_delay);
mm->numa_next_reset = now +
msecs_to_jiffies(sysctl_numa_balancing_scan_period_reset);
}
/*
* Reset the scan period if enough time has gone by. Objective is that
* scanning will be reduced if pages are properly placed. As tasks
* can enter different phases this needs to be re-examined. Lacking
* proper tracking of reference behaviour, this blunt hammer is used.
*/
migrate = mm->numa_next_reset;
if (time_after(now, migrate)) {
p->numa_scan_period = task_scan_min(p);
next_scan = now + msecs_to_jiffies(sysctl_numa_balancing_scan_period_reset);
xchg(&mm->numa_next_reset, next_scan);
}
/*