The pool_size is always PAGE_SIZE, and since it is a software
configuration paramter (and not a hardware description parameter), we
cannot make it part of the Device Tree binding, so we'd better remove
it from the platform_data as well.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
There is no need for the platform_data to give this ID, it is simply
the channel number, so we can compute it inside the driver when
registering the channels.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
Since we got rid of the per-XOR channel 'mv_xor' driver, now the
per-XOR engine driver that used to be called 'mv_xor_shared' can
simply be named 'mv_xor'.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
'struct mv_xor_shared_platform_data' used to be the platform_data
structure for the 'mv_xor_shared', but this driver is going to be
renamed simply 'mv_xor', so also rename its platform_data structure
accordingly.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
mv_xor_platform_data used to be the platform_data structure associated
to the 'mv_xor' driver. This driver no longer exists, and this data
structure really contains the properties of each XOR channel part of a
given XOR engine. Therefore 'struct mv_xor_channel_data' is a more
appropriate name.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
Now that XOR channels are directly registered by the main
'mv_xor_shared' device ->probe() function and all users of the
'mv_xor' device have been removed, we can get rid of the latter.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
Extend the XOR engine driver (currently called "mv_xor_shared") so
that XOR channels can be passed in the platform_data structure, and be
registered from there.
This will allow the users of the driver to be converted to the single
platform_driver variant of the mv_xor driver.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
