ANDROID: sched: Add deactivated (sleeping) owner handling to find_proxy_task()

If the blocked_on chain resolves to a sleeping owner, deactivate
the donor task, and enqueue it on the sleeping owner task.
Then re-activate it later when the owner is woken up.

NOTE: This has been particularly challenging to get working
properly, and some of the locking is particularly awkward. I'd
very much appreciate review and feedback for ways to simplify
this.

Cc: Joel Fernandes <joelaf@google.com>
Cc: Qais Yousef <qyousef@layalina.io>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>
Cc: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Cc: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>
Cc: Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com>
Cc: Zimuzo Ezeozue <zezeozue@google.com>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Cc: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
Cc: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>
Cc: Metin Kaya <Metin.Kaya@arm.com>
Cc: Xuewen Yan <xuewen.yan94@gmail.com>
Cc: K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
Cc: kernel-team@android.com
Change-Id: Ib7e9a793c13465be06a60dbdaff7e97133091e44
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Connor O'Brien <connoro@google.com>
[jstultz: This was broken out from the larger proxy() patch]
Signed-off-by: John Stultz <jstultz@google.com>
Bug: 306081722
---
v5:
* Split out from larger proxy patch
v6:
* Major rework, replacing the single list head per task with
  per-task list head and nodes, creating a tree structure so
  we only wake up descendants of the task woken.
* Reworked the locking to take the task->pi_lock, so we can
  avoid mid-chain wakeup races from try_to_wake_up() called by
  the ww_mutex logic.
v7:
* Drop unnecessary __nested lock annotation, as we already drop
  the lock prior.
* Add comments on #else & #endif lines, and clearer function
  names, and commit message tweaks as suggested by Metin Kaya
* Move activate_blocked_entities() call from ttwu_queue to
  try_to_wake_up() to simplify locking. Thanks to questions from
  Metin Kaya
* Fix irqsave/irqrestore usage now we call this outside where
  the pi_lock is held
* Fix activate_blocked_entitites not preserving wake_cpu
* Fix for UP builds
v8:
* Minor checkpatch fixup
* Drop proxy_deactivate and cleanups suggested by Metin
v9:
* Fix bug causing possibly uninitialized cpu value to be used with
  activate_blocked_entities()
* Improved comment around preserving wake_cpu suggested by Metin
* Add additional lockdep asserts, suggested by Metin
* Tweaked placement of lockdep assert, suggested by Metin
* Fixed comment referring to structure entry name
* Fix to call proxy_resched_idle() _prior_ to calling
  proxy_enqueue_on_owner() where we deactivate the task, this
  avoids stale references to rq_selected() when the task may
  have been migrated to another rq.
* Fix to remove the blocked_head list at the start of
  activate_blocked_entities() so we only do a finite amount
  of work, avoiding a potential livelock of two cpus removing
  and adding tasks to the list at the same time if the owner
  went back to sleep while blocked entities were being woken.
v11:
* Big rework to get rid of recursion. Had to add another list
  item to the task_stuct to do this as we are in atomic context
  and cannot allocate memory while activating blocked entities.
  Will need to watch carefully for bugs, as switching to a
  list_head in the task_struct instead of a pointer on the
  stack opens up the potential for races on the shared state,
  but I think I've got the locking sorted.
* Moved proxy_set_task_cpu helper to earlier in the series
* Minor rework for try_to_deactivate_task changes
* Minor variable name cleanups suggested by Metin
v13:
* Switch to use donor from next for proxy_enqueue_on_owner
* Switch to using block_task instead of deactivate_task
v14:
* Ensure we call block_task() last in proxy_enqueue_on_owner
  and not touch it again to avoid races where it might be
  activated on another cpu
* Make sure we activate blocked_entities when we exit from ttwu
* Fix to enqueue the last task in the chain (p) on the blocked
  owner instead of donor, so that we preserve the chain
  structure so mid-chain wakeups propagate properly
* Rework of sleeping_owner handling so that we properly deal
  with delayed-dequeued (sched_delayed) tasks (also removes
  now unused proxy_deactivate() logic)
This commit is contained in:
Peter Zijlstra
2023-07-14 04:57:30 +00:00
committed by John Stultz
parent 95c9e8505a
commit f86b854c98
3 changed files with 250 additions and 35 deletions
+5
View File
@@ -1215,6 +1215,11 @@ struct task_struct {
struct task_struct *blocked_donor; /* task that is boosting this task */
#ifdef CONFIG_SCHED_PROXY_EXEC
struct list_head migration_node;
struct list_head blocked_head; /* tasks blocked on this task */
struct list_head blocked_node; /* our entry on someone elses blocked_head */
/* Node for list of tasks to process blocked_head list for blocked entitiy activations */
struct list_head blocked_activation_node;
struct task_struct *sleeping_owner; /* task our blocked_node is enqueued on */
#endif
raw_spinlock_t blocked_lock;
+4
View File
@@ -2368,6 +2368,10 @@ __latent_entropy struct task_struct *copy_process(
p->blocked_donor = NULL; /* nobody is boosting p yet */
#ifdef CONFIG_SCHED_PROXY_EXEC
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&p->migration_node);
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&p->blocked_head);
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&p->blocked_node);
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&p->blocked_activation_node);
p->sleeping_owner = NULL;
#endif
#ifdef CONFIG_BCACHE
p->sequential_io = 0;
+241 -35
View File
@@ -3768,6 +3768,50 @@ static inline void ttwu_do_wakeup(struct task_struct *p)
}
#ifdef CONFIG_SCHED_PROXY_EXEC
static inline
void __proxy_remove_from_sleeping_owner(struct task_struct *owner, struct task_struct *p)
{
lockdep_assert_held(&owner->blocked_lock);
if (p->sleeping_owner == owner) {
list_del_init(&p->blocked_node);
WRITE_ONCE(p->sleeping_owner, NULL);
put_task_struct(owner); // matches get in proxy_enqueue_on_owner
}
}
static inline void proxy_remove_from_sleeping_owner(struct task_struct *p)
{
struct task_struct *owner = READ_ONCE(p->sleeping_owner);
if (owner) {
raw_spin_lock(&owner->blocked_lock);
__proxy_remove_from_sleeping_owner(owner, p);
raw_spin_unlock(&owner->blocked_lock);
}
}
static void do_activate_task(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int en_flags)
{
if (!sched_proxy_exec()) {
activate_task(rq, p, en_flags);
return;
}
lockdep_assert_rq_held(rq);
proxy_remove_from_sleeping_owner(p);
/*
* By calling activate_task with blocked_lock held, we
* order against the find_proxy_task() blocked_task case
* such that no more blocked tasks will be enqueued on p
* once we release p->blocked_lock.
*/
raw_spin_lock(&p->blocked_lock);
WARN_ON(task_cpu(p) != cpu_of(rq));
activate_task(rq, p, en_flags);
raw_spin_unlock(&p->blocked_lock);
}
#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
static inline void proxy_set_task_cpu(struct task_struct *p, int cpu)
{
@@ -3791,6 +3835,138 @@ static inline void proxy_set_task_cpu(struct task_struct *p, int cpu)
__set_task_cpu(p, cpu);
}
#endif /* CONFIG_SMP */
static void do_activate_blocked_waiter(struct rq *target_rq, struct task_struct *p, int en_flags)
{
unsigned long flags;
unsigned int state;
struct rq_flags rf;
int target_cpu = cpu_of(target_rq);
raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&p->pi_lock, flags);
state = READ_ONCE(p->__state);
/* Avoid racing with ttwu */
if (state == TASK_WAKING)
goto out;
if (READ_ONCE(p->on_rq)) {
/*
* We raced with a non mutex handoff activation of p.
* That activation will also take care of activating
* all of the tasks after p in the blocked_head list,
* so we're done here.
*/
goto out;
}
proxy_set_task_cpu(p, target_cpu);
rq_lock_irqsave(target_rq, &rf);
update_rq_clock(target_rq);
do_activate_task(target_rq, p, en_flags);
resched_curr(target_rq);
rq_unlock_irqrestore(target_rq, &rf);
out:
raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&p->pi_lock, flags);
}
static void activate_blocked_waiters(struct rq *target_rq,
struct task_struct *owner,
int wake_flags)
{
struct list_head bal_head;
unsigned long flags;
int en_flags = ENQUEUE_WAKEUP | ENQUEUE_NOCLOCK;
if (!sched_proxy_exec())
return;
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&bal_head);
if (wake_flags & WF_MIGRATED)
en_flags |= ENQUEUE_MIGRATED;
/*
* A whole bunch of 'proxy' tasks back this blocked task, wake
* them all up to give this task its 'fair' share.
*/
/*
* This is a little unique here and the locking is messy.
* At this point we only hold the blocked_lock, so the
* owner task may be able to run and do all sorts of
* things while we are processing the blocked_head list,
* including going back to sleep, which can cause tasks
* to be added to the owners->blocked_head while we are
* processing it!
* Thus, we pull the entire list off the owner->blocked_head
* here so that we will only process a finite amount of
* tasks. Tasks added after this will be processed by the
* future wake events.
* Even though we have pulled the list off the blocked_head
* the removed list is *still* "owned" and serialized by
* the owner->blocked_lock! As we have to serialize against
* mid-chain wakeups, who may try to remove themselves from
* the list.
*/
raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&owner->blocked_lock, flags);
if (!list_empty(&owner->blocked_activation_node)) {
raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&owner->blocked_lock, flags);
return;
}
get_task_struct(owner);
list_add_tail(&owner->blocked_activation_node, &bal_head);
raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&owner->blocked_lock, flags);
while (!list_empty(&bal_head)) {
struct list_head tmp_head;
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&tmp_head);
owner = list_first_entry(&bal_head, struct task_struct, blocked_activation_node);
raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&owner->blocked_lock, flags);
list_replace_init(&owner->blocked_head, &tmp_head);
list_del_init(&owner->blocked_activation_node);
while (!list_empty(&tmp_head)) {
struct task_struct *p;
p = list_first_entry(&tmp_head,
struct task_struct,
blocked_node);
WARN_ON(p == owner);
WARN_ON(p->sleeping_owner != owner);
__proxy_remove_from_sleeping_owner(owner, p);
raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&owner->blocked_lock, flags);
do_activate_blocked_waiter(target_rq, p, en_flags);
raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&p->blocked_lock, flags);
if (list_empty(&p->blocked_activation_node)) {
get_task_struct(p);
list_add_tail(&p->blocked_activation_node, &bal_head);
}
raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&p->blocked_lock, flags);
raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&owner->blocked_lock, flags);
}
put_task_struct(owner); // put matches get prior to adding to local bal_head
raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&owner->blocked_lock, flags);
}
}
#else /* !CONFIG_SCHED_PROXY_EXEC */
static inline void proxy_remove_from_sleeping_owner(struct task_struct *p)
{
}
static inline void do_activate_task(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p,
int en_flags)
{
activate_task(rq, p, en_flags);
}
static inline void activate_blocked_waiters(struct rq *target_rq,
struct task_struct *owner,
int wake_flags)
{
}
#endif /* CONFIG_SCHED_PROXY_EXEC */
#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
@@ -3850,7 +4026,7 @@ ttwu_do_activate(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int wake_flags,
atomic_dec(&task_rq(p)->nr_iowait);
}
activate_task(rq, p, en_flags);
do_activate_task(rq, p, en_flags);
wakeup_preempt(rq, p, wake_flags);
ttwu_do_wakeup(p);
@@ -3914,8 +4090,10 @@ static int ttwu_runnable(struct task_struct *p, int wake_flags)
rq = __task_rq_lock(p, &rf);
if (task_on_rq_queued(p)) {
update_rq_clock(rq);
if (p->se.sched_delayed)
if (p->se.sched_delayed) {
proxy_remove_from_sleeping_owner(p);
enqueue_task(rq, p, ENQUEUE_NOCLOCK | ENQUEUE_DELAYED);
}
if (!task_on_cpu(rq, p)) {
/*
* When on_rq && !on_cpu the task is preempted, see if
@@ -3949,13 +4127,19 @@ void sched_ttwu_pending(void *arg)
update_rq_clock(rq);
llist_for_each_entry_safe(p, t, llist, wake_entry.llist) {
int wake_flags;
if (WARN_ON_ONCE(p->on_cpu))
smp_cond_load_acquire(&p->on_cpu, !VAL);
if (WARN_ON_ONCE(task_cpu(p) != cpu_of(rq)))
set_task_cpu(p, cpu_of(rq));
ttwu_do_activate(rq, p, p->sched_remote_wakeup ? WF_MIGRATED : 0, &rf);
wake_flags = p->sched_remote_wakeup ? WF_MIGRATED : 0;
ttwu_do_activate(rq, p, wake_flags, &rf);
rq_unlock(rq, &rf);
activate_blocked_waiters(rq, p, wake_flags);
rq_lock(rq, &rf);
update_rq_clock(rq);
}
/*
@@ -4475,10 +4659,10 @@ int try_to_wake_up(struct task_struct *p, unsigned int state, int wake_flags)
#else
cpu = task_cpu(p);
#endif /* CONFIG_SMP */
ttwu_queue(p, cpu, wake_flags);
}
out:
activate_blocked_waiters(cpu_rq(task_cpu(p)), p, wake_flags);
if (success) {
trace_android_rvh_try_to_wake_up_success(p);
ttwu_stat(p, task_cpu(p), wake_flags);
@@ -6815,26 +6999,6 @@ proxy_resched_idle(struct rq *rq)
return rq->idle;
}
static bool proxy_deactivate(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *donor)
{
unsigned long state = READ_ONCE(donor->__state);
/* Don't deactivate if the state has been changed to TASK_RUNNING */
if (state == TASK_RUNNING)
return false;
/*
* Because we got donor from pick_next_task, it is *crucial*
* that we call proxy_resched_idle before we deactivate it.
* As once we deactivate donor, donor->on_rq is set to zero,
* which allows ttwu to immediately try to wake the task on
* another rq. So we cannot use *any* references to donor
* after that point. So things like cfs_rq->curr or rq->donor
* need to be changed from next *before* we deactivate.
*/
proxy_resched_idle(rq);
return try_to_block_task(rq, donor, state, true);
}
#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
/*
* If the blocked-on relationship crosses CPUs, migrate @p to the
@@ -6920,6 +7084,28 @@ void proxy_migrate_task(struct rq *rq, struct rq_flags *rf,
}
#endif /* CONFIG_SMP */
static void proxy_enqueue_on_owner(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *owner,
struct task_struct *p)
{
lockdep_assert_rq_held(rq);
lockdep_assert_held(&owner->blocked_lock);
/*
* ttwu_activate() will pick them up and place them on whatever rq
* @owner will run next.
*/
WARN_ON(p == owner);
WARN_ON(!p->on_rq);
WARN_ON(p->sleeping_owner);
get_task_struct(owner);
WRITE_ONCE(p->sleeping_owner, owner);
/*
* ttwu_do_activate must not have a chance to activate p
* elsewhere before it's fully extricated from its old rq.
*/
list_add(&p->blocked_node, &owner->blocked_head);
block_task(rq, p, 0);
}
/*
* Find runnable lock owner to proxy for mutex blocked donor
*
@@ -7026,18 +7212,38 @@ find_proxy_task(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *donor, struct rq_flags *rf)
return proxy_resched_idle(rq);
}
if (!owner->on_rq) {
/* XXX Don't handle blocked owners yet */
if (!proxy_deactivate(rq, donor))
goto needs_return;
goto out;
}
if (!owner->on_rq || owner->se.sched_delayed) {
/*
* rq->curr must not be added to the blocked_head list or else
* ttwu_do_activate could enqueue it elsewhere before it switches
* out here. The approach to avoid this is the same as in the
* migrate_task case.
*/
if (curr_in_chain) {
raw_spin_unlock(&p->blocked_lock);
raw_spin_unlock(&mutex->wait_lock);
return proxy_resched_idle(rq);
}
if (owner->se.sched_delayed) {
/* XXX Don't handle delayed dequeue yet */
if (!proxy_deactivate(rq, donor))
goto needs_return;
goto out;
/*
* If !@owner->on_rq, holding @rq->lock will not pin the task,
* so we cannot drop @mutex->wait_lock until we're sure its a blocked
* task on this rq.
*
* We use @owner->blocked_lock to serialize against ttwu_activate().
* Either we see its new owner->on_rq or it will see our list_add().
*/
if (owner != p) {
raw_spin_unlock(&p->blocked_lock);
raw_spin_lock(&owner->blocked_lock);
}
proxy_resched_idle(rq);
proxy_enqueue_on_owner(rq, owner, p);
raw_spin_unlock(&owner->blocked_lock);
raw_spin_unlock(&mutex->wait_lock);
return NULL; /* retry task selection */
}
/*