tick/nohz: Only check for RCU deferred wakeup on user/guest entry when needed

Checking for and processing RCU-nocb deferred wakeup upon user/guest
entry is only relevant when nohz_full runs on the local CPU, otherwise
the periodic tick should take care of it.

Make sure we don't needlessly pollute these fast-paths as a -3%
performance regression on a will-it-scale.per_process_ops has been
reported so far.

Fixes: 47b8ff194c (entry: Explicitly flush pending rcuog wakeup before last rescheduling point)
Fixes: 4ae7dc97f7 (entry/kvm: Explicitly flush pending rcuog wakeup before last rescheduling point)
Reported-by: kernel test robot <oliver.sang@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210527113441.465489-1-frederic@kernel.org

kernel/entry/common.c

@@ -5,6 +5,7 @@
 #include <linux/highmem.h>
 #include <linux/livepatch.h>
 #include <linux/audit.h>
+#include <linux/tick.h>
 
 #include "common.h"
 
@@ -186,7 +187,7 @@ static unsigned long exit_to_user_mode_loop(struct pt_regs *regs,
 		local_irq_disable_exit_to_user();
 
 		/* Check if any of the above work has queued a deferred wakeup */
-		rcu_nocb_flush_deferred_wakeup();
+		tick_nohz_user_enter_prepare();
 
 		ti_work = READ_ONCE(current_thread_info()->flags);
 	}
@@ -202,7 +203,7 @@ static void exit_to_user_mode_prepare(struct pt_regs *regs)
 	lockdep_assert_irqs_disabled();
 
 	/* Flush pending rcuog wakeup before the last need_resched() check */
-	rcu_nocb_flush_deferred_wakeup();
+	tick_nohz_user_enter_prepare();
 
 	if (unlikely(ti_work & EXIT_TO_USER_MODE_WORK))
 		ti_work = exit_to_user_mode_loop(regs, ti_work);