From de8f7188626f9137be14142abd650ba1a50581bb Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: John Stultz Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2022 21:43:51 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] ANDROID: softirq: Add generic accessor to percpu softirq_pending data In a previous iteration of this patch series, I was checking: per_cpu(irq_stat, cpu).__softirq_pending which resulted in build errors on s390. This patch tries to create a generic accessor to this percpu softirq_pending data. This interface is inherently racy as its reading percpu data without a lock. However, being able to peek at the softirq pending data allows us to make better decisions about rt task placement vs just ignoring it. On s390 this call returns 0, which maybe isn't ideal but results in no functional change from what we do now. TODO: Heiko suggested changing s390 to use a proper per-cpu irqstat variable instead. Feedback or suggestions for better approach here would be welcome! Cc: John Dias Cc: Connor O'Brien Cc: Rick Yiu Cc: John Kacur Cc: Qais Yousef Cc: Chris Redpath Cc: Abhijeet Dharmapurikar Cc: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Ingo Molnar Cc: Juri Lelli Cc: Vincent Guittot Cc: Dietmar Eggemann Cc: Steven Rostedt Cc: Thomas Gleixner Cc: Heiko Carstens Cc: Vasily Gorbik Cc: Joel Fernandes Cc: Alexander Gordeev Cc: kernel-team@android.com Reported-by: kernel test robot Signed-off-by: John Stultz Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20221116075929.453876-2-jstultz@google.com/ Change-Id: I4dd25438aaa4ccdd9b502d55d4678a41b1bc40be Bug: 168521633 Bug: 332627282 --- arch/s390/include/asm/hardirq.h | 6 ++++++ include/linux/interrupt.h | 11 +++++++++++ 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+) diff --git a/arch/s390/include/asm/hardirq.h b/arch/s390/include/asm/hardirq.h index a5b45388c91f..da3d5304a92d 100644 --- a/arch/s390/include/asm/hardirq.h +++ b/arch/s390/include/asm/hardirq.h @@ -16,6 +16,12 @@ #define local_softirq_pending() (get_lowcore()->softirq_pending) #define set_softirq_pending(x) (get_lowcore()->softirq_pending = (x)) #define or_softirq_pending(x) (get_lowcore()->softirq_pending |= (x)) +/* + * Not sure what the right thing is here for s390, + * but returning 0 will result in no logical change + * from what happens now + */ +#define __cpu_softirq_pending(x) (0) #define __ARCH_IRQ_STAT #define __ARCH_IRQ_EXIT_IRQS_DISABLED diff --git a/include/linux/interrupt.h b/include/linux/interrupt.h index 457151f9f263..6cbb6cb136e9 100644 --- a/include/linux/interrupt.h +++ b/include/linux/interrupt.h @@ -534,6 +534,17 @@ DECLARE_STATIC_KEY_FALSE(force_irqthreads_key); #define set_softirq_pending(x) (__this_cpu_write(local_softirq_pending_ref, (x))) #define or_softirq_pending(x) (__this_cpu_or(local_softirq_pending_ref, (x))) +/** + * __cpu_softirq_pending() - Checks to see if softirq is pending on a cpu + * + * This helper is inherently racy, as we're accessing per-cpu data w/o locks. + * But peeking at the flag can still be useful when deciding where to place a + * task. + */ +static inline u32 __cpu_softirq_pending(int cpu) +{ + return (u32)per_cpu(local_softirq_pending_ref, cpu); +} #endif /* local_softirq_pending */ /* Some architectures might implement lazy enabling/disabling of