ksmbd: fix use-after-free in smb_break_all_levII_oplock()
commit 18b4fac5ef17f77fed9417d22210ceafd6525fc7 upstream. There is a room in smb_break_all_levII_oplock that can cause racy issues when unlocking in the middle of the loop. This patch use read lock to protect whole loop. Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Reported-by: Norbert Szetei <norbert@doyensec.com> Tested-by: Norbert Szetei <norbert@doyensec.com> Signed-off-by: Namjae Jeon <linkinjeon@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Steve French <stfrench@microsoft.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
This commit is contained in:
committed by
Greg Kroah-Hartman
parent
6e30c0e102
commit
d54ab1520d
@@ -129,14 +129,6 @@ static void free_opinfo(struct oplock_info *opinfo)
|
||||
kfree(opinfo);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static inline void opinfo_free_rcu(struct rcu_head *rcu_head)
|
||||
{
|
||||
struct oplock_info *opinfo;
|
||||
|
||||
opinfo = container_of(rcu_head, struct oplock_info, rcu_head);
|
||||
free_opinfo(opinfo);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
struct oplock_info *opinfo_get(struct ksmbd_file *fp)
|
||||
{
|
||||
struct oplock_info *opinfo;
|
||||
@@ -157,8 +149,8 @@ static struct oplock_info *opinfo_get_list(struct ksmbd_inode *ci)
|
||||
if (list_empty(&ci->m_op_list))
|
||||
return NULL;
|
||||
|
||||
rcu_read_lock();
|
||||
opinfo = list_first_or_null_rcu(&ci->m_op_list, struct oplock_info,
|
||||
down_read(&ci->m_lock);
|
||||
opinfo = list_first_entry(&ci->m_op_list, struct oplock_info,
|
||||
op_entry);
|
||||
if (opinfo) {
|
||||
if (opinfo->conn == NULL ||
|
||||
@@ -171,8 +163,7 @@ static struct oplock_info *opinfo_get_list(struct ksmbd_inode *ci)
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
rcu_read_unlock();
|
||||
up_read(&ci->m_lock);
|
||||
|
||||
return opinfo;
|
||||
}
|
||||
@@ -185,7 +176,7 @@ void opinfo_put(struct oplock_info *opinfo)
|
||||
if (!atomic_dec_and_test(&opinfo->refcount))
|
||||
return;
|
||||
|
||||
call_rcu(&opinfo->rcu_head, opinfo_free_rcu);
|
||||
free_opinfo(opinfo);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static void opinfo_add(struct oplock_info *opinfo)
|
||||
@@ -193,7 +184,7 @@ static void opinfo_add(struct oplock_info *opinfo)
|
||||
struct ksmbd_inode *ci = opinfo->o_fp->f_ci;
|
||||
|
||||
down_write(&ci->m_lock);
|
||||
list_add_rcu(&opinfo->op_entry, &ci->m_op_list);
|
||||
list_add(&opinfo->op_entry, &ci->m_op_list);
|
||||
up_write(&ci->m_lock);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -207,7 +198,7 @@ static void opinfo_del(struct oplock_info *opinfo)
|
||||
write_unlock(&lease_list_lock);
|
||||
}
|
||||
down_write(&ci->m_lock);
|
||||
list_del_rcu(&opinfo->op_entry);
|
||||
list_del(&opinfo->op_entry);
|
||||
up_write(&ci->m_lock);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -1347,8 +1338,8 @@ void smb_break_all_levII_oplock(struct ksmbd_work *work, struct ksmbd_file *fp,
|
||||
ci = fp->f_ci;
|
||||
op = opinfo_get(fp);
|
||||
|
||||
rcu_read_lock();
|
||||
list_for_each_entry_rcu(brk_op, &ci->m_op_list, op_entry) {
|
||||
down_read(&ci->m_lock);
|
||||
list_for_each_entry(brk_op, &ci->m_op_list, op_entry) {
|
||||
if (brk_op->conn == NULL)
|
||||
continue;
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -1358,7 +1349,6 @@ void smb_break_all_levII_oplock(struct ksmbd_work *work, struct ksmbd_file *fp,
|
||||
if (ksmbd_conn_releasing(brk_op->conn))
|
||||
continue;
|
||||
|
||||
rcu_read_unlock();
|
||||
if (brk_op->is_lease && (brk_op->o_lease->state &
|
||||
(~(SMB2_LEASE_READ_CACHING_LE |
|
||||
SMB2_LEASE_HANDLE_CACHING_LE)))) {
|
||||
@@ -1388,9 +1378,8 @@ void smb_break_all_levII_oplock(struct ksmbd_work *work, struct ksmbd_file *fp,
|
||||
oplock_break(brk_op, SMB2_OPLOCK_LEVEL_NONE, NULL);
|
||||
next:
|
||||
opinfo_put(brk_op);
|
||||
rcu_read_lock();
|
||||
}
|
||||
rcu_read_unlock();
|
||||
up_read(&ci->m_lock);
|
||||
|
||||
if (op)
|
||||
opinfo_put(op);
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -71,7 +71,6 @@ struct oplock_info {
|
||||
struct list_head lease_entry;
|
||||
wait_queue_head_t oplock_q; /* Other server threads */
|
||||
wait_queue_head_t oplock_brk; /* oplock breaking wait */
|
||||
struct rcu_head rcu_head;
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
struct lease_break_info {
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user