media: solo6x10: use 'time_left' variable with wait_for_completion_timeout()

There is a confusing pattern in the kernel to use a variable named
'timeout' to store the result of wait_for_completion_timeout() causing
patterns like:

        timeout = wait_for_completion_timeout(...)
        if (!timeout) return -ETIMEDOUT;

with all kinds of permutations. Use 'time_left' as a variable to make the
code self explaining.

Fix to the proper variable type 'unsigned long' while here.

Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>
Acked-by: Ismael Luceno <ismael@iodev.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Hans Verkuil <hverkuil-cisco@xs4all.nl>
This commit is contained in:
Wolfram Sang
2024-08-05 23:51:19 +02:00
committed by Hans Verkuil
parent 24a19e4b3a
commit b09b6f26ad
+4 -4
View File
@@ -57,7 +57,7 @@ int solo_p2m_dma_desc(struct solo_dev *solo_dev,
int desc_cnt)
{
struct solo_p2m_dev *p2m_dev;
unsigned int timeout;
unsigned long time_left;
unsigned int config = 0;
int ret = 0;
unsigned int p2m_id = 0;
@@ -99,12 +99,12 @@ int solo_p2m_dma_desc(struct solo_dev *solo_dev,
desc[1].ctrl);
}
timeout = wait_for_completion_timeout(&p2m_dev->completion,
solo_dev->p2m_jiffies);
time_left = wait_for_completion_timeout(&p2m_dev->completion,
solo_dev->p2m_jiffies);
if (WARN_ON_ONCE(p2m_dev->error))
ret = -EIO;
else if (timeout == 0) {
else if (time_left == 0) {
solo_dev->p2m_timeouts++;
ret = -EAGAIN;
}