tmakin/ack-tegra
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

cxl/core: Convert to EXPORT_SYMBOL_NS_GPL

Browse Source 
It turns out that the usb example of specifying the subsystem namespace
at build time is not preferred. The rationale for that preference has
become more apparent as CXL patches with plain EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL beg the
question, "why would any code other than CXL care about this symbol?".
Make the namespace explicit.

Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/163676356810.3618264.601632777702192938.stgit@dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com
Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
This commit is contained in:
Dan Williams
2021-11-12 16:32:58 -08:00
parent 5e2411ae80
commit affec78274
6 changed files with 29 additions and 29 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files
drivers/cxl/core/memdev.c
+3 -3
View File
@@ -150,7 +150,7 @@ void set_exclusive_cxl_commands(struct cxl_dev_state *cxlds, unsigned long *cmds
CXL_MEM_COMMAND_ID_MAX);
up_write(&cxl_memdev_rwsem);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(set_exclusive_cxl_commands);
EXPORT_SYMBOL_NS_GPL(set_exclusive_cxl_commands, CXL);
/**
* clear_exclusive_cxl_commands() - atomically enable user cxl commands
@@ -164,7 +164,7 @@ void clear_exclusive_cxl_commands(struct cxl_dev_state *cxlds, unsigned long *cm
CXL_MEM_COMMAND_ID_MAX);
up_write(&cxl_memdev_rwsem);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(clear_exclusive_cxl_commands);
EXPORT_SYMBOL_NS_GPL(clear_exclusive_cxl_commands, CXL);
static void cxl_memdev_shutdown(struct device *dev)
{
@@ -317,7 +317,7 @@ err:
put_device(dev);
return ERR_PTR(rc);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(devm_cxl_add_memdev);
EXPORT_SYMBOL_NS_GPL(devm_cxl_add_memdev, CXL);
__init int cxl_memdev_init(void)
{