[PATCH] powerpc: enable PPC_PTRACE_[GS]ETREGS on ppc32
I have tested PPC_PTRACE_GETREGS and PPC_PTRACE_SETREGS on umview. I do not understand why historically these tags has been defined as PPC_PTRACE_GETREGS and PPC_PTRACE_SETREGS instead of simply PTRACE_[GS]ETREGS. The other "originality" is that the address must be put into the "addr" field instead of the "data" field as stated in the manual. Signed-off-by: renzo davoli <renzo@cs.unibo.it> Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
This commit is contained in:
committed by
Paul Mackerras
parent
c029cc66cb
commit
98a90c0279
@@ -229,13 +229,13 @@ do { \
|
||||
#define PTRACE_GET_DEBUGREG 25
|
||||
#define PTRACE_SET_DEBUGREG 26
|
||||
|
||||
#ifdef __powerpc64__
|
||||
/* Additional PTRACE requests implemented on PowerPC. */
|
||||
#define PPC_PTRACE_GETREGS 0x99 /* Get GPRs 0 - 31 */
|
||||
#define PPC_PTRACE_SETREGS 0x98 /* Set GPRs 0 - 31 */
|
||||
#define PPC_PTRACE_GETFPREGS 0x97 /* Get FPRs 0 - 31 */
|
||||
#define PPC_PTRACE_SETFPREGS 0x96 /* Set FPRs 0 - 31 */
|
||||
|
||||
#ifdef __powerpc64__
|
||||
/* Calls to trace a 64bit program from a 32bit program */
|
||||
#define PPC_PTRACE_PEEKTEXT_3264 0x95
|
||||
#define PPC_PTRACE_PEEKDATA_3264 0x94
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user