FROMGIT: pinmux: fix race causing mux_owner NULL with active mux_usecount
commit 5a3e85c3c397 ("pinmux: Use sequential access to access
desc->pinmux data") tried to address the issue when two client of the
same gpio calls pinctrl_select_state() for the same functionality, was
resulting in NULL pointer issue while accessing desc->mux_owner.
However, issue was not completely fixed due to the way it was handled
and it can still result in the same NULL pointer.
The issue occurs due to the following interleaving:
cpu0 (process A) cpu1 (process B)
pin_request() { pin_free() {
mutex_lock()
desc->mux_usecount--; //becomes 0
..
mutex_unlock()
mutex_lock(desc->mux)
desc->mux_usecount++; // becomes 1
desc->mux_owner = owner;
mutex_unlock(desc->mux)
mutex_lock(desc->mux)
desc->mux_owner = NULL;
mutex_unlock(desc->mux)
This sequence leads to a state where the pin appears to be in use
(`mux_usecount == 1`) but has no owner (`mux_owner == NULL`), which can
cause NULL pointer on next pin_request on the same pin.
Ensure that updates to mux_usecount and mux_owner are performed
atomically under the same lock. Only clear mux_owner when mux_usecount
reaches zero and no new owner has been assigned.
Bug: 430525600
Fixes: 5a3e85c3c397 ("pinmux: Use sequential access to access desc->pinmux data")
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20250708-pinmux-race-fix-v2-1-8ae9e8a0d1a1@oss.qualcomm.com/
Signed-off-by: Mukesh Ojha <mukesh.ojha@oss.qualcomm.com>
(cherry picked from commit 0b075c011032f88d1cfde3b45d6dcf08b44140eb
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/linusw/linux-pinctrl.git for-next)
Change-Id: Iec29ea201ef0fc3d205bbc4f1a90cb5a56a62039
Signed-off-by: Mukesh Ojha <mukesh.ojha@oss.qualcomm.com>
This commit is contained in:
committed by
Treehugger Robot
parent
9f514cf3d9
commit
6b4fffd5b2
@@ -236,6 +236,15 @@ static const char *pin_free(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev, int pin,
|
||||
if (desc->mux_usecount)
|
||||
return NULL;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if (gpio_range) {
|
||||
owner = desc->gpio_owner;
|
||||
desc->gpio_owner = NULL;
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
owner = desc->mux_owner;
|
||||
desc->mux_owner = NULL;
|
||||
desc->mux_setting = NULL;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
@@ -247,17 +256,6 @@ static const char *pin_free(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev, int pin,
|
||||
else if (ops->free)
|
||||
ops->free(pctldev, pin);
|
||||
|
||||
scoped_guard(mutex, &desc->mux_lock) {
|
||||
if (gpio_range) {
|
||||
owner = desc->gpio_owner;
|
||||
desc->gpio_owner = NULL;
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
owner = desc->mux_owner;
|
||||
desc->mux_owner = NULL;
|
||||
desc->mux_setting = NULL;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
module_put(pctldev->owner);
|
||||
|
||||
return owner;
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user