tmakin/ack-tegra
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

reiserfs: rework reiserfs_warning

Browse Source 
ReiserFS warnings can be somewhat inconsistent.
In some cases:
 * a unique identifier may be associated with it
 * the function name may be included
 * the device may be printed separately

This patch aims to make warnings more consistent. reiserfs_warning() prints
the device name, so printing it a second time is not required. The function
name for a warning is always helpful in debugging, so it is now automatically
inserted into the output. Hans has stated that every warning should have
a unique identifier. Some cases lack them, others really shouldn't have them.
reiserfs_warning() now expects an id associated with each message. In the
rare case where one isn't needed, "" will suffice.

Signed-off-by: Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
This commit is contained in:
Jeff Mahoney
2009-03-30 14:02:21 -04:00
committed by Linus Torvalds
parent 1d889d9958
commit 45b03d5e8e
17 changed files with 454 additions and 426 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files
fs/reiserfs/fix_node.c
+7 -7
View File
@@ -496,8 +496,8 @@ static int get_num_ver(int mode, struct tree_balance *tb, int h,
snum012[needed_nodes - 1 + 3] = units;
if (needed_nodes > 2)
reiserfs_warning(tb->tb_sb, "vs-8111: get_num_ver: "
"split_item_position is out of boundary");
reiserfs_warning(tb->tb_sb, "vs-8111",
"split_item_position is out of range");
snum012[needed_nodes - 1]++;
split_item_positions[needed_nodes - 1] = i;
needed_nodes++;
@@ -533,8 +533,8 @@ static int get_num_ver(int mode, struct tree_balance *tb, int h,
if (vn->vn_vi[split_item_num].vi_index != TYPE_DIRENTRY &&
vn->vn_vi[split_item_num].vi_index != TYPE_INDIRECT)
reiserfs_warning(tb->tb_sb, "vs-8115: get_num_ver: not "
"directory or indirect item");
reiserfs_warning(tb->tb_sb, "vs-8115",
"not directory or indirect item");
}
/* now we know S2bytes, calculate S1bytes */
@@ -2268,9 +2268,9 @@ static int wait_tb_buffers_until_unlocked(struct tree_balance *p_s_tb)
#ifdef CONFIG_REISERFS_CHECK
repeat_counter++;
if ((repeat_counter % 10000) == 0) {
reiserfs_warning(p_s_tb->tb_sb,
"wait_tb_buffers_until_released(): too many "
"iterations waiting for buffer to unlock "
reiserfs_warning(p_s_tb->tb_sb, "reiserfs-8200",
"too many iterations waiting "
"for buffer to unlock "
"(%b)", locked);
/* Don't loop forever. Try to recover from possible error. */